Do shocks have to be changed with springs?

Body Kits, Rims, Suspension, Wings, Lighting etc and exterior detailing.

Moderators: daewoomofo, Moderators Group

Locked
bluecube
Posts: 60
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 3:38 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Do shocks have to be changed with springs?

Post by bluecube »

Hey everyone. I am thinking of buying a set of King Springs for my Cielo Sedan (30mm lowered springs). I recently replaced the rear shock absorbers as I got them pretty cheaply off ebay, however the front shocks seem to be very expensive to find in Australia (e.g over $200 AU for both). If i just replaced the springs, would I really need to change the front shocks? Idealy i'd like to but I don't really want to have to spend that much on front shocks alone. My front shocks are in pretty good condition I think (very little bouncing when pushed) but I would like to lower the car to improve handling a bit.

Any advice would be great! :)
MMamdouh
Moderator
Posts: 7299
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 8:33 am
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Contact:

Post by MMamdouh »

associating shocks and springs replacment - IMO - is a cost reduction issue in countries where labour is expensive... for me i replace whichever part is worn and just let the other parts be.

i recently replaced all my 4 shocks but the springs were not replaced so in your case i think you only need to replace the shocks if the are worn... you said the rear ones are newly replaced and the front are in a good condition so i don't see why you would have to replace them.

always remeber that shocks are a consumable and eventually will need replacment... if the front ones are old - as old as the previous rear set of shocks - then most probably they are going to die soon, if labour is too expensive i say go for a change but if my assumptions are wrong then you are OK with just the new springs.

MMamdouh
Driving is the utmost fun you can have with your pants on!
Check out my ride: http://www.cardomain.com/ride/567267
Image
woo
Expert
Posts: 769
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 12:12 pm
Location: AUSTRALIA

Post by woo »

if you lower the car with stiffer springs then you should technically change your shocks to ones that are more suited to the new spring rate
330w carbon kevlar
Image
you'd better believe thats a paddlin

"a woman is like a refridgerator, bout 6ft tall, 300 pounds........."
wOo-TaNg
Super
Posts: 284
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 11:05 pm
Location: CHi-twn
Contact:

Post by wOo-TaNg »

yea it did seem rather expensive what they were offering for changing the springs i guess $$ wise your better of knocking two birds with one stone
User avatar
lanos2001
Expert
Posts: 4245
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 9:35 pm
Location: lawton oklahoma

Post by lanos2001 »

money wise like everyone said would be cheaper to have them changed at the same time but if you just buy springs and don't plan to change the shocks, your shocks will wear out faster which means eventually down the line you'd have to change them anyways.


nick
Image

save a tree, eat a beaver.
User avatar
AcingTeam
Expert
Posts: 2700
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 2:48 am
Location: New Milford, CT
Contact:

Post by AcingTeam »

I'd say that really $$$ wise would be not changing your shocks. I've had cut springs with like a 2" drop for over a year. Then switched to Eibachs 1.2" drop (had them for over a year) never replaced my shocks and they're still great.
Image
Locked