Which is better for turbo setup: BOV or Dump valve?

Here you will find general facts about Daewoo Vehicles

Moderators: daewoomofo, Moderators Group

MMamdouh
Moderator
Posts: 7299
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 8:33 am
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Contact:

Which is better for turbo setup: BOV or Dump valve?

Post by MMamdouh »

which is better to have on a given turbo setup? what are the +ve and -ve side of both valves?

MMamdouh
Last edited by MMamdouh on Sun Dec 17, 2006 10:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Driving is the utmost fun you can have with your pants on!
Check out my ride: http://www.cardomain.com/ride/567267
Image
klonek78
Junior
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 9:46 pm

Re: BOV vs. bypass valve

Post by klonek78 »

MMamdouh wrote:which is better to have on a given turbo setup? what are the +ve and -ve side of both valves?

MMamdouh
when you have mapsensor (don't have airflow sensor) you can use BOV (better sound ;) ) or DV - your choice. There isn't any diff. between them for engine to work. when you have airflow sensor you must use DV, becasue if "air" has been already "counted" and must return to intake pipe.
User avatar
PrecisionBoost
Super Moderator
Posts: 4437
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 5:59 am
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Post by PrecisionBoost »

I'm a little confused about what you mean by "bypass valve"

You have two choices.... dump air to atmosphere or dump it back into the intake.

Dumping air back into the intake before the turbo makes the system more efficent but it also increases the temperature of the intake air before the turbo.

When you say "bypass valve" I immediatly think of waistgate on the turbine side.... since it allows the exaust to bypass the turbo and reduce the pressure going to the turbine side of the turbo.
2010 BMW 335D
1994 Opel Calibra 4X4 turbo ( C20LET 2.0L Turbo )
2002 Daewoo lanos
Audacity Racing
moron
Posts: 4493
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:18 am
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Contact:

Post by Audacity Racing »

i personally like recirculation valves better than bov's. if your intercooler is designed well enough for the system, you get better returns from a RV than a BOV. a lot of times, if your intercooler is to big and you get a massive pressure drop, you can recirculate to bring the temp up and thus raise the pressure
MMamdouh
Moderator
Posts: 7299
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 8:33 am
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Contact:

Post by MMamdouh »

chris@PrecisionBoost wrote:I'm a little confused about what you mean by "bypass valve"
i was aming at the dump valve with that term.

MMamdouh
Driving is the utmost fun you can have with your pants on!
Check out my ride: http://www.cardomain.com/ride/567267
Image
MMamdouh
Moderator
Posts: 7299
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 8:33 am
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Contact:

Re: BOV vs. bypass valve

Post by MMamdouh »

klonek78 wrote: when you have airflow sensor you must use DV, becasue if "air" has been already "counted" and must return to intake pipe.
in this case the air return point should be after the sensor to avoid counting the same amount of air twice... right??

MMamdouh
Driving is the utmost fun you can have with your pants on!
Check out my ride: http://www.cardomain.com/ride/567267
Image
klonek78
Junior
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 9:46 pm

Re: BOV vs. bypass valve

Post by klonek78 »

MMamdouh wrote:
klonek78 wrote: when you have airflow sensor you must use DV, becasue if "air" has been already "counted" and must return to intake pipe.
in this case the air return point should be after the sensor to avoid counting the same amount of air twice... right??

MMamdouh
of course. DV return point is always after airflow sensor and before turbocharger.
klonek78
Junior
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 9:46 pm

Post by klonek78 »

Audacityracing wrote:i personally like recirculation valves better than bov's. if your intercooler is designed well enough for the system, you get better returns from a RV than a BOV. a lot of times, if your intercooler is to big and you get a massive pressure drop, you can recirculate to bring the temp up and thus raise the pressure
but return point is before turbocharger and high temp of intake air won't be good for performance. It won't raise pressure in intake system, only raise temp of intake air.
User avatar
PrecisionBoost
Super Moderator
Posts: 4437
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 5:59 am
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Post by PrecisionBoost »

Our airflow is calculated from MAP, IAT, TPS sensors.... which are not affected by the position of the recirculation point.....you do have to worry about the point if you using a MAF (mass air flow) sensor. (like they do in the C20LET, C20XE )
2010 BMW 335D
1994 Opel Calibra 4X4 turbo ( C20LET 2.0L Turbo )
2002 Daewoo lanos
Stefan
Super
Posts: 264
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:31 pm
Location: Essex, England

Post by Stefan »

If there's no MAF before the turbo use an atmospheric dump valve (BOV) as close to the compressor outlet as you can.
If there is it's best to use a recirculating valve.


Stef
Vauxhall Astra.
T3 60trim, Intercooler, Mopar Super 60 Injectors, SDS Stand Alone EFI, Cast T3 Manifold With External Wastegate + More...
klonek78
Junior
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 9:46 pm

Post by klonek78 »

Stefan wrote:If there's no MAF before the turbo use an atmospheric dump valve (BOV) as close to the compressor outlet as you can.
If there is it's best to use a recirculating valve.


Stef
I won't agree. BOV and DV should be used as close to throttle body (not compressor outlet) as it possible.
DAEWOO NUBIRA II 2,0turbo (K04+2,5"exhaust tuned with SMT7) CDX WAGON 222222km so far :)
350KM@470Nm by GT28RS+N2O coming soon :D
MMamdouh
Moderator
Posts: 7299
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2004 8:33 am
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Contact:

Post by MMamdouh »

what does the difference in valve position affect?

MMamdouh
Driving is the utmost fun you can have with your pants on!
Check out my ride: http://www.cardomain.com/ride/567267
Image
Stefan
Super
Posts: 264
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:31 pm
Location: Essex, England

Post by Stefan »

klonek78 wrote:
Stefan wrote:If there's no MAF before the turbo use an atmospheric dump valve (BOV) as close to the compressor outlet as you can.
If there is it's best to use a recirculating valve.


Stef
I won't agree. BOV and DV should be used as close to throttle body (not compressor outlet) as it possible.
No.
Think carefully about the function of the valve...
Think about the effects of losses incurred in having the airflow go through all the intercooling pipework and an intercooler...
Just because most people and many "tuners" do place them near the throttle does not mean it's the right way... Many engineers at professional levels of motorsport don't.
Placing the valve near the throttle rather than near the compressor outlet will cause a greater drop in boost/compressor speed between gearshifts and higher loads on the turbos thrust bearing.
If anyone says "what about response!" well an extra 2 ft of vacuum hose won't make a difference that you can tell...


Another benefit of mounting it near the compressor outlet is that the valve will be louder ;) If you like that kinda thing :p

Stef
Vauxhall Astra.
T3 60trim, Intercooler, Mopar Super 60 Injectors, SDS Stand Alone EFI, Cast T3 Manifold With External Wastegate + More...
klonek78
Junior
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 9:46 pm

Post by klonek78 »

Stefan wrote:
klonek78 wrote:
Stefan wrote:If there's no MAF before the turbo use an atmospheric dump valve (BOV) as close to the compressor outlet as you can.
If there is it's best to use a recirculating valve.


Stef
I won't agree. BOV and DV should be used as close to throttle body (not compressor outlet) as it possible.
No.
Think carefully about the function of the valve...
Think about the effects of losses incurred in having the airflow go through all the intercooling pipework and an intercooler...
Just because most people and many "tuners" do place them near the throttle does not mean it's the right way... Many engineers at professional levels of motorsport don't.
Placing the valve near the throttle rather than near the compressor outlet will cause a greater drop in boost/compressor speed between gearshifts and higher loads on the turbos thrust bearing.
If anyone says "what about response!" well an extra 2 ft of vacuum hose won't make a difference that you can tell...


Another benefit of mounting it near the compressor outlet is that the valve will be louder ;) If you like that kinda thing :p

Stef
but returning "airwave" will be dumped earlier before reach compressor.... don't you think so?
DAEWOO NUBIRA II 2,0turbo (K04+2,5"exhaust tuned with SMT7) CDX WAGON 222222km so far :)
350KM@470Nm by GT28RS+N2O coming soon :D
Stefan
Super
Posts: 264
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 7:31 pm
Location: Essex, England

Post by Stefan »

The returning "air wave" in the days when turbo kits had no intercooler would have an adverse effect on the compressor.
However, these days where most people now use intercoolers, most of the waves energy is dissipated as it expands into the intercooler end tank and then into the intercooler core.
If no intercooler is used it is still advisable to mount it near the compressor outlet. The energy of the wave will be reduced by the effects of the "T" junction where the BOV is fitted.
The main point of installing the BOV after the compressor outlet is so the compressor does not have to pump air through all the piping and the intercooler. All these cause flow losses and the compressor requires hp from the turbine to overcome them. With no power supplied by the turbine because the throttle is closed the compressor will "coast down" quickly as it tries to overcome those losses. If the compressor can pump air direct to atmosphere after the outlet there's minimal losses to overcome, so the compressor requires less hp to overcome them and will "coast down" slower.
In translation it means there is less boost drop between shifts.

Stef
Vauxhall Astra.
T3 60trim, Intercooler, Mopar Super 60 Injectors, SDS Stand Alone EFI, Cast T3 Manifold With External Wastegate + More...
Locked