Kalos 2.2L

N/A tech, Cold Air Intakes, Spark Plugs/wires, Cat backs, Exhaust...etc

Moderators: daewoomofo, Moderators Group

Deathwind
Junior
Posts: 190
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 8:49 am

Kalos 2.2L

Post by Deathwind »

Image

Image

The silver Kalos is 2.2L engine powered, and the blue one is 1.6L dohc.
Last edited by Deathwind on Mon Dec 12, 2005 12:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Audacity Racing
moron
Posts: 4493
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:18 am
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Contact:

Post by Audacity Racing »

wow... nice torque curve... really flat!
User avatar
Brian5475E
Expert
Posts: 753
Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 2:49 am
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio USA
Contact:

Post by Brian5475E »

I want to see engine bay pics. Also what is that in HP and ft/lbs. Guys at GM provin g grounds have those numbers fromthe 1.6 now. They will release info after the 1st of the year.
Aveo that moves! Now I need those cams!
woo
Expert
Posts: 769
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 12:12 pm
Location: AUSTRALIA

Post by woo »

why does the blue one have such an assortment of different badges?? Last time i checked, they werent 350Z's and definately werent M3's
330w carbon kevlar
Image
you'd better believe thats a paddlin

"a woman is like a refridgerator, bout 6ft tall, 300 pounds........."
User avatar
BosnianLanos
Expert
Posts: 1661
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 10:31 pm
Location: Clearwater, Florida
Contact:

Post by BosnianLanos »

woo wrote:why does the blue one have such an assortment of different badges?? Last time i checked, they werent 350Z's and definately werent M3's
Lol, who cares, they are ultra-light Kaloses with "big-block" 2.2L engines. If you have that small of a car with that much torque and HP, you are permitted to badge it Cadillac if you wanted to.

Good work Intimidator and Deathwind.
Audacity Racing
moron
Posts: 4493
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:18 am
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Contact:

Post by Audacity Racing »

am i correct in my calculations?!?! surely not!!!


136ish hp...


14.75 ft/lb?!?!?!?!

User avatar
AcingTeam
Expert
Posts: 2700
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 2:48 am
Location: New Milford, CT
Contact:

Post by AcingTeam »

Audacityracing wrote:am i correct in my calculations?!?! surely not!!!


136ish hp...


14.75 ft/lb?!?!?!?!

the torque is in metrics system. So it's a lot more than what it states.
Image
Audacity Racing
moron
Posts: 4493
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:18 am
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Contact:

Post by Audacity Racing »

i know...


look here... http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=kg ... gle+Search


if you do the math it turns out to be around 30 lb/ft



i'm at a loss here :?
User avatar
AcingTeam
Expert
Posts: 2700
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 2:48 am
Location: New Milford, CT
Contact:

Post by AcingTeam »

kg.m/sec2

This should be the formula.... remember how you converted the turbo lanos posted in the forced indunction section? Same thing here...
Image
Audacity Racing
moron
Posts: 4493
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:18 am
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Contact:

Post by Audacity Racing »

wow... i butchered that up bad :oops:


haha... i'm getting my mechanical engineering degree and i did that :oops:


it's 114lb/ft :wink:
User avatar
PrecisionBoost
Super Moderator
Posts: 4437
Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 5:59 am
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Post by PrecisionBoost »

Ummm.... a Kg-m/sec2 is a Newton.... which is not torque.

Torque would be a Newton-meter

Torque is also sometimes measured in Kg-m

So I would assume that this is making around 20.64 Kg-m

To convert to N-m you simply multiply by 9.81 m/Sec2

which gives you 202.5 N-m of torque

Converted to lb-ft that is 149lb-ft

At 3800RPM it made it's maximum torque.

Horspower = RPM X Torque /5252

horsepower = 3800 X 149 /5252

Horsepower = 108 hp

If you look at the dyno curve.... it shows about 110hp so the torque must have been what I said it was........ 149 lb ft

So.... I say its 137hp @ 5200RPM and 149lbft @3800RPM
2010 BMW 335D
1994 Opel Calibra 4X4 turbo ( C20LET 2.0L Turbo )
2002 Daewoo lanos
Audacity Racing
moron
Posts: 4493
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:18 am
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Contact:

Post by Audacity Racing »

and once again, i'm retarded... the factor of multiplication is 7.233 :oops:


i'm losing it or my excel sheets are messed up BAD :roll:


***sorry for all the mis-info and wasted posts :oops: :oops: :oops: , i got my stuff sorted out now
tango
Moderator
Posts: 459
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 4:30 pm
Location: Montego Bay, Jamaica
Contact:

Post by tango »

For the love of GOD!! Why is it that people believe that slapping the biggest engine in a small car is to be done without consideration to how that torque and power will be bolstered? DRUMS?!? Gimme a break. Moving ON!
Cogito ergo sum...
Deathwind
Junior
Posts: 190
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 8:49 am

Intimidator

Post by Deathwind »

tango wrote:For the love of GOD!! Why is it that people believe that slapping the biggest engine in a small car is to be done without consideration to how that torque and power will be bolstered? DRUMS?!? Gimme a break. Moving ON!
I cannot understand the meaning :oops:
genie47
Junior
Posts: 159
Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 8:42 am

Re: Intimidator

Post by genie47 »

Deathwind wrote:
tango wrote:For the love of GOD!! Why is it that people believe that slapping the biggest engine in a small car is to be done without consideration to how that torque and power will be bolstered? DRUMS?!? Gimme a break. Moving ON!
I cannot understand the meaning :oops:
What he means is that with that much engne power, you have to have equally or even more stopping power. The brakes should be more powerful than the engine in order to stop it from creating a situation called tragedy. :lol:

Theoretically speaking, before any increase in engine power from transplants or forced induction, you have to solve this first. I did this when I had my Starlet, I installed discs for all 4 wheels before proceeding to put in the turbocharged transplant.
Locked