I ask as I've seen Exhaust extractors offered which look well made but don't allow for the the upstream sensor or Cat to be retained, rather --as I understand the somewhat un-english explanations-- the upstream sensor to be relocated in the downstream sensor position with the aid of a wireing extension (not provided
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/930f9/930f9b854c71e50b85054a00d927ea9008d84f84" alt="Bad Grin :badgrin:"
suprise!--not) which obviously leaves the downstream sensor short of a hole and an exhaust system short of a cat.
And an engine maybe starting to run like a three leged dog.
I'm thinking a better result would be obtained by replacing the factory cat (which is a bolt out/in unit) with a highflow metalcat keeping the centre section of the exhaust to retain the tuning pulse effect and replacing the rear muffler with a more freely flowing sports job (not necessarily a straight through) it would certainly be a sight simpler , probably emmissions compliant , more cost effective , no sensor movement required and hey--maybe a few of horseys gain.
I'm probably going to get
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a28a/9a28a782a88b7018a514989781a550bb30dcbc6f" alt="UT :gib:"
for these thoughts though--but whatdoyareckon ?
I'm not after big power , just a tad more briskness.
When I want power I use this one
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3758/c3758905a9881c08a311e1f356df2719f5507b35" alt="Image"