I'm looking for....
Frontal Area
Coefficient of drag
Front/Rear weight distribution
Anyone have this Lacetti data handy?
Moderators: daewoomofo, Moderators Group
-
- moron
- Posts: 4493
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:18 am
- Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
- Contact:
- PrecisionBoost
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 4437
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2003 5:59 am
- Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Don't think I've seen any published specs on this info.... I weighed my Optra once but I have no idea what I did with the figures.
For some reason I think I remember there being a review about the forenza saying something about it's coefficent of drag.... but that was a few years back.... no idea where it was.
For some reason I think I remember there being a review about the forenza saying something about it's coefficent of drag.... but that was a few years back.... no idea where it was.
2010 BMW 335D
1994 Opel Calibra 4X4 turbo ( C20LET 2.0L Turbo )
2002 Daewoo lanos
1994 Opel Calibra 4X4 turbo ( C20LET 2.0L Turbo )
2002 Daewoo lanos
-
- moron
- Posts: 4493
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:18 am
- Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
- Contact:
-
- moron
- Posts: 4493
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:18 am
- Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
- Contact:
Stock Forenza 5-speed without me in it and a full tank was right at 2876lbs
Front was 1630lbs = 57%
rear was 1240lbs = 43%
(slight difference is due to style of measurement with wheel overhang on a slope)
Actually much closer to a good balance than I expected... seems the rear suspension is heavier than I imagined
Front was 1630lbs = 57%
rear was 1240lbs = 43%
(slight difference is due to style of measurement with wheel overhang on a slope)
Actually much closer to a good balance than I expected... seems the rear suspension is heavier than I imagined
-
- Expert
- Posts: 3772
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 4:47 am
- Location: USA, Arizona
- Contact:
Did you get in the car afterward too see how acurate it was?Audacity Racing wrote:Stock Forenza 5-speed without me in it and a full tank was right at 2876lbs
Front was 1630lbs = 57%
rear was 1240lbs = 43%
(slight difference is due to style of measurement with wheel overhang on a slope)
Actually much closer to a good balance than I expected... seems the rear suspension is heavier than I imagined
Someone locally tried two different truck stops and said they were both wayyy too far off.
Plus that seams a tad high, I think I did ~2650# without my rear seat, but with my subs, with 20lbs wheels, lowering springs, axle back exhaust, probably intake, and maybe a few other bits. Oh and I had nearly a half tank of gas, if I remember right a full tank is about 115lbs.
www.KinkyMotorsports.com
04' Dropped Foreno
-Coil-overs, sway bars, 13" brakes, LSD, 235mm tires, the works
-Turbo in the works
01' Lanos Sport
-Undergoing 2.0 swap w/ lots of performance bits
http://www.cardomain.com/id/kinkyllama
04' Dropped Foreno
-Coil-overs, sway bars, 13" brakes, LSD, 235mm tires, the works
-Turbo in the works
01' Lanos Sport
-Undergoing 2.0 swap w/ lots of performance bits
http://www.cardomain.com/id/kinkyllama
-
- moron
- Posts: 4493
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:18 am
- Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
- Contact:
It also depends on the options you have in the car... the factory options vary by quite a bit in the weight. The manual shows weights varying between 2670 and 2832 depending on transmission and trim option... in dry state... so add the cooling system, oil system, and fuel system.
And I'm pretty sure it was accurate, it was within 5 lbs of my bodyweight while standing on it...
And I'm pretty sure it was accurate, it was within 5 lbs of my bodyweight while standing on it...