rotrex s/c's
Moderators: daewoomofo, Moderators Group
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 8:02 am
- Location: Auburn, Washington
- Contact:
rotrex s/c's
Im researching the rotrex s/c's for my aveo
and im trying to figure out what the hp is
it will read C30-74 head unit 150-300 hp
what does the 150-300hp mean???
is that how much hp it can handle or is it the range of hp of the engine you can put it on?
and im trying to figure out what the hp is
it will read C30-74 head unit 150-300 hp
what does the 150-300hp mean???
is that how much hp it can handle or is it the range of hp of the engine you can put it on?
-
- moron
- Posts: 4493
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:18 am
- Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
- Contact:
The HP rating is plausible power... the potetial the charger has depending on the engine size.
The HP is directly related to the displacement of the engine. If I had to guess, it would be 5-6psi (I haven't looked at the graph, I honestly have no idea)... 5-6psi on the stock motor is about 140-150hp, putting you at the bottom of the range for that specific compressor.
The HP is directly related to the displacement of the engine. If I had to guess, it would be 5-6psi (I haven't looked at the graph, I honestly have no idea)... 5-6psi on the stock motor is about 140-150hp, putting you at the bottom of the range for that specific compressor.
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 8:02 am
- Location: Auburn, Washington
- Contact:
-
- moron
- Posts: 4493
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:18 am
- Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
- Contact:
If it's too big for the engine....
1. You won't be able to turn it effectively
2. You'll not make enough boost
3. You'll not be able to fit it under the hood
Shoot for a smaller compressor that will bump your power. S/C's work within specified ranges. Since they are parasitic (they ROB power), you have to have a beefy engine to get a good gain from it. This is the law of diminishing returns... at some point an engine will be too small to turn it over effectively and the boost will be replacing the power lost in parasitic drag.
Use the smaller one, if not smallest (I know you picked the next step up from what you could have)
1. You won't be able to turn it effectively
2. You'll not make enough boost
3. You'll not be able to fit it under the hood
Shoot for a smaller compressor that will bump your power. S/C's work within specified ranges. Since they are parasitic (they ROB power), you have to have a beefy engine to get a good gain from it. This is the law of diminishing returns... at some point an engine will be too small to turn it over effectively and the boost will be replacing the power lost in parasitic drag.
Use the smaller one, if not smallest (I know you picked the next step up from what you could have)
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 8:02 am
- Location: Auburn, Washington
- Contact:
-
- moron
- Posts: 4493
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:18 am
- Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
- Contact:
Smaller pulley = harder to turn = more parasitic loss
So we have two very distinct and contrasting ideas here...
1. A smaller pulley will spin the supercharger faster giving more boost and thus more power
2. A smaller pulley is harder to turn and is a greater source of energy loss in the car
The balance between the two comes in sizing appropriately. A smaller charger with a smaller pulley is an OK route to go on a small displacement engine. It's a better option than a large charger and a large pulley.
Trust me when I say you'll be happier with a smaller, easier revving charger that makes good boost as opposed to a large one that doesn't turn well and makes mediocre boost
So we have two very distinct and contrasting ideas here...
1. A smaller pulley will spin the supercharger faster giving more boost and thus more power
2. A smaller pulley is harder to turn and is a greater source of energy loss in the car
The balance between the two comes in sizing appropriately. A smaller charger with a smaller pulley is an OK route to go on a small displacement engine. It's a better option than a large charger and a large pulley.
Trust me when I say you'll be happier with a smaller, easier revving charger that makes good boost as opposed to a large one that doesn't turn well and makes mediocre boost
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 8:02 am
- Location: Auburn, Washington
- Contact:
-
- moron
- Posts: 4493
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:18 am
- Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 8:02 am
- Location: Auburn, Washington
- Contact:
Are you planning to build the motor? Pushing over 8psi on stock motor is getting risky. Unless you want to just push it and see how much it can take before something gives out. I'm planning to put mine up to 8psi soon, but the tuning has to be good or else I will probably blow something. I would consider 10psi quite risky, and anything over that just asking for trouble without some upgraded internals.AveoSSTurbo wrote:is 8 psi the most i can boost? i was hoping for 10 maybe a lil more.
2004 Optra/Forenza/Lacetti - 225whp - Haltech Sprint500 - CT12B - Getrag F28 6spd - KW V3 Coilovers - FX35 Retrofit
2002 IS300 5MT - 615whp - AEM EMS - GT4088R - Built 9.5CR - R154 - TRD LSD - SupraTT T/B - Varex - LS430 Retrofit
2002 IS300 5MT - 615whp - AEM EMS - GT4088R - Built 9.5CR - R154 - TRD LSD - SupraTT T/B - Varex - LS430 Retrofit
LMAO 4 fuel pumps 5 alternator belts??? how lol......... I don't see why the alternator belt should be affected in any way.AcingTeam wrote:My friend put a turbo on his M3 (V6), he's only running like 5psi. His got an exhaust, but the engine is pretty much stock. He already went through like 4 fuel pumps, 5 alternator belts etc. The car isn't very reliable... and it's only 5psi on almost a stock motor.
Also I believe M3's are I6 (inline 6).
2004 Optra/Forenza/Lacetti - 225whp - Haltech Sprint500 - CT12B - Getrag F28 6spd - KW V3 Coilovers - FX35 Retrofit
2002 IS300 5MT - 615whp - AEM EMS - GT4088R - Built 9.5CR - R154 - TRD LSD - SupraTT T/B - Varex - LS430 Retrofit
2002 IS300 5MT - 615whp - AEM EMS - GT4088R - Built 9.5CR - R154 - TRD LSD - SupraTT T/B - Varex - LS430 Retrofit
-
- moron
- Posts: 4493
- Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 5:18 am
- Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
- Contact:
I agree. 10psi is too far for any reliability unless you intend on running a water-cooled intercooler, alcohol injection, or high test fuel all the time.exist3nce wrote:Are you planning to build the motor? Pushing over 8psi on stock motor is getting risky. Unless you want to just push it and see how much it can take before something gives out. I'm planning to put mine up to 8psi soon, but the tuning has to be good or else I will probably blow something. I would consider 10psi quite risky, and anything over that just asking for trouble without some upgraded internals.AveoSSTurbo wrote:is 8 psi the most i can boost? i was hoping for 10 maybe a lil more.
Yeah, I think you're right, they are inline 6. He's now upgrading to an aftermarket fuel pump. And I have no idea why he had problems with his alternator belt... but those are the numbers, I'm not even exaggarating.exist3nce wrote:LMAO 4 fuel pumps 5 alternator belts??? how lol......... I don't see why the alternator belt should be affected in any way.AcingTeam wrote:My friend put a turbo on his M3 (V6), he's only running like 5psi. His got an exhaust, but the engine is pretty much stock. He already went through like 4 fuel pumps, 5 alternator belts etc. The car isn't very reliable... and it's only 5psi on almost a stock motor.
Also I believe M3's are I6 (inline 6).
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2006 8:02 am
- Location: Auburn, Washington
- Contact: