It's easy to find theory on the Internet.
From what you are trying to explained, if there is no O2, the fuel will not burn at all.
Ok, in theory please explain to me: After eight months of buying my Lanos, I installed a sensor that lowered to 13 degrees and only had the second catalytic empty. All the exhaust system was stock and an universal intake. One Saturday, a year ago, I was driving thru the highway and there appears another Lanos at my side. By hearing the car I notices it was a 1.6 and like we say on PR, it was "asesina". We lower to 2nd and took off, he went by like a car, changed to 3rd and we were almost parallel. He won the race by forcing the 3rd. By that time, I thought on not forcing my car thinking I could brake the clutch, but now I can do it.
If the O2 didn't help me, with all the fuel my car had, please explain why there wasn't too much distance. Not everything is theory.
I have a partner that when he started working with his car (CRX '91 1.6 SOHC) by soothing the engine. Everybody told him that he was crazy. By theory he was eliminating the torque. He continued with his project and came the day to take out the car and when they noticed that the car was failing from 1000 to 3000, people was saying that his inventions damaged the engine but when he push the fuel till the end with 9000 rpm

, everybody was astonished. They took the car to a speedway. Time: 13.8 (1/4 fuel only)

Not everything is theory. Theory is good to amaze people. I believed in theory the first 6 months of studying mechanic. Today, I don't believe in it.
Please don't misunderstand my words. I'm just trying to present my opinion.
